Discussion of Financial Results

Review of Operations

Vintage is fundamental to the business as it determines the quality and quantity of wine available for future sales in all markets.  

Grape Intake – The Company sources 98% of the grapes from the independent growers with the balance being harvested from the Company’s own vineyards.  The resultant wine from the “own use” is used for sale under the Peter Lehmann brand, for sale in bulk to other wineries and under buyers’ own brand labels.  Seasonal conditions were ideal during the growing period and during harvest.  Although the crop delivered was lower than average, the good quality fruit resulted in the production of excellent wines.

Contract Crushing –  Work is actively sought from other wineries as a means of securing overhead recoveries.  The harvesting times for grape growing districts and grape varieties differ and this allows PLW to spread the crushing activities over the vintage period.    Over the years to 2009 PLW had a contract to crush grapes on behalf of a large Australian wine producer and this mutually satisfactory arrangement came to an end when the contract was not renewed.   Quite simply the lower demand for Australian wines has resulted in excess winery capacity in the industry as well as an oversupply of grapes.   The cessation of this contract reduced throughput substantially and this has been reflected in higher overhead costs per litre. 

 

Vintage - Tonnes

Year 

  Crushed - Own Use

  Crushed Contract

Total Crushed     

1994

6,493

5,410

11,903

1995

4,991

5,031

10,022

1996

8,326

5,876

14,202

1997

7,309

5,211

12,520

1998

7,608

6,261

13,869

1999

7,760

6,422

14,182

2000

5,991

4,923

10,914

2001

10,157

5,214

15,371

2002

11,561

5,509

17,070

2003

9,506

4,796

14,302

2004

14,588

4,360

18,948

2005

17,308

3,771

21,079

2006

13,643

3,752

17,395

2007

8,021

3,634

11,655

2008

14,150

3,991

18,141

2009

10,992

3,837

14,829

2010

10,138

339

10,477

2011

11,000

380

11,380

2012

8,184

992

9,176

PLW Vineyards

The Company has three vineyards located in the Barossa Valley and a fourth located in the Clare Valley.  Having vineyards under its own control provides PLW winemakers with flexibility in securing fruit grown under specific viticulture management regimes.  The area planted is given in the table below.

Vineyard Hectares

Year

Hectares Planted

Year

Hectares Planted

1994

-

2004

41

1995

18

2005

41

1996

18

2006

41

1997

36

2007

41

1998

36

2008

41

1999

57

2009

41

2000

57

2010

41

2001

57

2011

41

2002

71

2012

41

2003

71

   

Sales Revenue

PLW continually monitors stock holdings and aligns these with bottled wine sales and forecasts.  Wine identified as being surplus to requirements is made available for sale on the spot market which has partially recovered from the low point experienced throughout the Australian wine industry.  Export sales accounted for 44% (2011: 56%) of sales volume. 

Sales Revenue by Volume

Year

Bottled - Domestic

Bottled - UK

Bottled - Export excl UK

Bulk - Current Vintage

Bulk - Prior Vintages

Total Revenue by Vol

1994

16%

15%

4%

44%

21%

100%

1995

15%

17%

4%

37%

27%

100%

1996

15%

18%

5%

44%

18%

100%

1997

16%

21%

4%

36%

23%

100%

1998

21%

33%

5%

27%

14%

100%

1999

27%

34%

6%

21%

12%

100%

2000

36%

33%

11%

8%

12%

100%

2001

33%

32%

17%

8%

10%

100%

2002

37%

28%

17%

10%

8%

100%

2003

43%

24%

22%

8%

3%

100%

2004

37%

25%

26%

7%

5%

100%

2005

37%

26%

25%

4%

8%

100%

2006

32%

27%

29%

5%

7%

100%

2007

28%

20%

28%

2%

22%

100%

2008

29%

19%

33%

6%

13%

100%

2009

33%

16%

38%

7%

6%

100%

2010

32%

13%

38%

5%

12%

100%

2011

29%

10%

45%

6%

10%

100%

2012

30%

5%

38%

5%

22%

100%

Sales Revenue by Dollars

Year

Bottled - Domestic

Bottled - UK

Bottled - Export excl UK

Bulk - Current Vintage

Bulk - Prior Vintages

Contract Services

Sales Revenue $000's

1994

32%

26%

6%

24%

12%

0%

12,979

1995

31%

33%

7%

18%

11%

0%

13,662

1996

31%

27%

7%

22%

8%

5%

17,167

1997

31%

30%

8%

16%

11%

4%

22,113

1998

32%

43%

7%

10%

5%

3%

31,243

1999

39%

39%

9%

7%

3%

3%

35,146

2000

46%

31%

16%

2%

3%

2%

36,406

2001

38%

31%

24%

2%

2%

3%

41,696

2002

41%

27%

25%

3%

2%

2%

44,762

2003

43%

23%

29%

2%

1%

2%

46,091

2004

38%

23%

33%

2%

2%

2%

51,250

2005

37%

24%

32%

1%

4%

2%

55,543

2006

34%

24%

37%

1%

3%

1%

57,592

2007

31%

21%

39%

1%

7%

1%

63,487

2008

33%

11%

45%

3%

6%

2%

61,999

2009

34%

8%

51%

2%

3%

2%

52,598

2010

35%

7%

49%

2%

6%

1%

50,088

2011

31%

6%

54%

3%

5%

1%

45,634

2012

36%

4%

45%

2%

12%

1%

40,798

Branded domestic sales were up 13% in volume and 6% in value compared with the previous year. Over supply, continued market consolidation and the strong presence of New Zealand white wine are major factors negatively influencing the domestic scene.

PLW total branded export sales have also been adversely affected by the poor global conditions and adverse exchange rates, with volume and value down, 25% and 28% respectively. PLW exited the onerous joint venture arrangement in the UK during the second half of the year.

The Company’s largest export market remains a collective of countries in Continental Europe with sales of a similar volume to that in our Australian market. Sales for the past twelve months were down 20% in volume and 26% in value over that for the previous year. The revenue was adversely affected by the strengthening Australian dollar.

Bulk wine sales recovered from the slowdown experienced in the aftermath of the global financial crisis and PLW was able to quit surplus stock on the bulk wine spot market.

The Barossa district is highly regarded as a world class producer of top quality fruit and PLW has sufficient volumes of high quality wine available which will greatly assist in meeting future sales aspirations. The low volume national 2012 vintage assisted in decreasing stockholdings generally although supply remains ahead of demand.

Profitability – Management is cognisant of the need to balance volume growth aspirations with profitability targets. The stronger Australian dollar affected profitability with $78,000 of translation exchange rate losses being recorded compared with losses of $654,000 in the prior period.

The reporting of certain assets and liabilities at fair value at reporting date introduced more volatility into the measurement of profit. This principle applies to biological assets - grape vines and their crops, as well as financial derivatives such as interest rate swaps and forward exchange contracts.

A measure of trading profitability EBIT expressed as a percentage of sales. The outcome is determined by the mix of revenue activities and their respective margins as well as PLW’s ability to contain costs and expenses. The 2004 EBIT % has been calculated exclusive of the takeover costs in order to compare the performance with prior years.

Year

EBIT as % of Sales Revenue

Year

EBIT as % of Sales Revenue

1994

17%

2004

19%

1995

16%

2005

20%

1996

19%

2006

19%

1997

20%

2007

16%

1998

18%

2008

24%

1999

21%

2009

19%

2000

23%

2010

13%

2001

23%

2011

6%

2002

24%

2012

1%

2003

20%

   

After tax profit and earnings per share are other indicators of profitability.  The 2004 result was affected adversely by the takeover costs.

Year

After Tax Profit $000's

Basic Earnings per Share cents

No of Shares at Balance Date 000's

1994

1,352

7.1c

18,930

1995

1,296

6.8c

18,930

1996

1,807

9.4c

19,170

1997

2,589

11.9c

25,371

1998

3,464

12.2c

30,946

1999

4,475

13.9c

33,235

2000

5,009

15.1c

33,260

2001

6,195

18.1c

34,147

2002

6,915

19.0c

36,359

2003

5,419

14.5c

37,311

2004

3,830

10.1c

37,969

2005

6,317

16.6c

37,969

2006

5,748

15.1c

37,969

2007

5,975

15.7c

37,969

2008

9,604

25.3c

37,969

2009

5,736

15.1c

37,969

2010

3,795

10.0c

37,969

2011

1,006

5.5c

37,969

2012

(520)

(1.4c)

37,969

Another measure of profitability is the return on shareholders’ equity. This is measured as the after tax profit (ATP) expressed as a percentage of shareholders’ equity. The 2004 return on shareholders’ equity was affected by the takeover costs.

Return on Equity

Year

ATP as a % of Equity

Year

ATP as a % of Equity

1994

14%

2004

7%

1995

13%

2005

12%

1996

16%

2006

10%

1997

17%

2007

10%

1998

17%

2008

14%

1999

16%

2009

9%

2000

17%

2010

6%

2001

18%

2011

1%

2002

16%

2012

(1%)

2003

11%

   

Review of Financial Condition

Capital Investment and Structure

Contributed equity remained constant at $30.6M with the use of debt facilities increasing from $15.5M at 30 June 2011 to $16.9M at 30 June 2012.

At 30 June 2012 gearing (interest bearing debt as a percentage of capital employed) was 25% (2011: 23%). Interest cover (the number of times operating profit before interest and tax is greater than the total interest charge) was 0.4 times (2011: 2.2 times). The rate is below the financial covenant level. The bank did not waive its rights and the Company continues its negotiations to maintain its bank facility. In the interim the parent company has provided a standby letter of credit and a letter of continuing financial support.

The nature of the industry requires the maturation of red and fortified wines beyond a 12 month period. The lower 2012 grape crop volume was countered by the slowdown in sales and as a result the value of inventory holdings at 30 June 2012 of $50.8M is 2% higher than the 2010 level of $49.9M. The Group is aware of the need to balance the volumes of wines held for future sales.

Capital projects and working capital requirements have been funded by funds generated by operating activities.

In the year ended 30 June 2012 the Company recorded a loss and a future tax benefit instead of a tax expense. In the prior year the Company recorded an effective tax rate of 29.8% o the operating profit before tax which compared with the company tax rate of 30%.

The Company has determined not to declare a dividend. This determination is in keeping with the board’s policy of dividends moving broadly in line with underlying earnings per share.